Calgary Jeep Association
4x4 Related Groups => Tech Talk => Topic started by: .:.Dingman.:. on June 02, 2009, 10:38:49 PM
-
so I got really bored today and decided to see about this f150 "lift" just for giggles. It all started by a trip to the junkyard where I picked up some 79 f150 coils for 35 , an hour later and they were in the front of my zj they gave about 1.75 of lift the ride isn't that bad at all. If you got any questions ask away.
-
Where's the pictures? lol
-
give me till tomorrow
-
Your using these on a V8 correct?
4.0 would prob be a bit to light...?
-
;D you did it! I was being a smarta$$ when i said that.
-
yeah i'm using them on a v8 they messure 16 with no weight on them and 13.5 compressed and yeah I did it I'm 19 and laid off I have nothing better to do with my time the ride isnt all that much worse I kinda like it :-[
-
you give me inspiration, now i want to try it on my V6, lol. probly be 15 inches compressed ;D
-
do it I'll even help you ;) but don't forget I was the first one on this board to do it. Also you could use them in the front of your 4.0 but it might be really bumpy
-
V6?
-
V6?
Sorry - Straight 6, hehe 4.0L
-
V6, the very early xj came with the gm 2.8L v6. it was like having two brake pedals. one slowed you down, and the other slowed you down even more.
anyone do this f150 coil swap deal on a tj? im lookin for a cheap lift for a buddies tj. lookin at whats out there.
-
V6, the very early xj came with the gm 2.8L v6.
Cherokee fans don't like to talk about that, thank you very much. :-X
-
So the V6 2.8L that came in the 1985 wagoneer was not a good engine??
-
Not nearly as good as the 4.0L was even AMC's 258 from the CJ would have been a better choice.
The 4cyl that was available that year only made about 5 or 10 less HP but got significantly better fuel economy.
Why do you ask? Have you got one?
-
Not nearly as good as the 4.0L was even AMC's 258 from the CJ would have been a better choice.
The 4cyl that was available that year only made about 5 or 10 less HP but got significantly better fuel economy.
Why do you ask? Have you got one?
No I don't have the 2.8L, but someone I know is looking at buying a 1985 2.8L wagoneer so I was asking just for information purposes. Well they said its a V6, I am assuming it's the 2.8L
-
No I don't have the 2.8L, but someone I know is looking at buying a 1985 2.8L wagoneer so I was asking just for information purposes. Well they said its a V6, I am assuming it's the 2.8L
tell them to run, fast.