Calgary Jeep Association

Author Topic: Longfields U Joints stronger then CTMs  (Read 811 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline calltrex

  • Talks waaay too much!
  • Posts: 1398
Longfields U Joints stronger then CTMs
« on: November 09, 2007, 09:32:45 PM »
I decided to get these before.. But I just came accross this u joint test now

$290 for a pair of Longfield D44 U-Joints

Longfields U Joints stronger then CTMs

Specimen....... Peak Load (lbs)
SPICER..................48, 649
LONGFIELD............162,400
YUKON...................92,599
CTM.....................158,732



Full article here:

http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com/images/StressTest.pdf
........___________
.......//.......""""......\\
....=//___________\\=
.....(@)___JEEP_(__@)
......\____I===I____/
.../""""/........J
../""""/=(=)___....../""""/
./___/............==/""""/
....................../___

Offline hps4evr

  • Administrator
  • Talks waaay too much!
  • Posts: 2959
Longfields U Joints stronger then CTMs
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2007, 04:11:07 PM »
it may come down to which you can get cheaper or which is more readily available. i havent heard of anybody breaking a CTM, im sure its happened. but id say whichever you get, you will end up with a super strong joint. next part down the line to break is...
YJ=Y’all Jealous

Offline Bnine

  • Talks waaay too much!
  • Posts: 2572
  • Sticky Fingers
Longfields U Joints stronger then CTMs
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2007, 03:51:33 PM »
As a one off test, it isnt very conclusive.

Multiple joints would need to be broken to truly prove any one better then the other.

At the end of the day, all it proves is that you get a similar joint for less money.

CTMS are more proven to last in fulltime hub vehicles like jeeps.

Longs are not as tested, but may last just as well. Its the risk you take.

Jack (ctm) is better known to be easier to deal with.

In the end, pick your poison.
My Mechanic Calgary
Mobile Auto Care
403-483-1083
[email protected]