That's quite unfair, IMO. Are you suggesting that maybe he should crawl under a rock and never come looking for help? At least he is asking HOW to deal with a dealership on this issue.
No, what i am saying is that the approach is very instrumental in the final outcome.
i am sure if there is one side to a story, than there is also 'another' side to the story.
i think it is fair to agree to pay for diagnosis if it involves extra labor because of the mods we put on.
Lets say they tear down his jeep and have 2 hours into it and find out that the tranny is ok and that some other problem exists. Do you think that 2 hours should be covered by the dealer?
i do not.
Did the problem occur after a body lift was put in?
Most times the body lift can cause this problem to happen as has been discussed many time on many forums.
It is a super easy fix (extend the linkage on the shifter).
Now, if Var. sity says we will 'dig' into the problem but it will cost you time and labor IF the problem is NOT the internals of the tranny. Why is that not fair?
Now if they get in there and the problem is the tranny, than it is covered.
Sounds fair to me.
As for slaggin? You are right, bad choice of wording. He was only complaining.
i will give you one more example of fairness. My jeep had an aftermarket skidplate and oil pan plate. i agreed to pay the 'extra' time it took the dealership to take off those plates to get at the perceived problem. Even when issue was warrantied, i paid some labor charges for removing and re installing my aftermarket skids. i do not expect Chrysler to pay for that.
As i read the original post, it appears that Varsity was offering to 'go in and find out what really was wrong (not what was written up as the perceived problem) and if it were true, they would warranty it.
Am i missing something?