An opinion on real time experience.
i think it makes no sense to allow 2 types of radio transmission on a run.
WHY?
Lets say we have 8 rigs. 5 have CB and 3 have FRS. Lets also say that 2 CB rigs also have FRS.
The trail leader has CB only and that means the tailgunner MUST have both in order to communicate FRS messages to the trail (CB ONLY) leader. Now lets say that any member in the group needs to be communicated to immediately! and that further communication is necessary immediately to safely guide someone up or someone backwards down. If two sources are used for communication and that one source has to be recommunicated to someone with a different source 2 things may happen to endanger one person or perhaps the group.
1/ The re communicated message takes too long.
2/ The recommunicated message is an interpretation of someone elses original message and it can be misconstrued.
Lets say Jeep A (leader) is already up a tough section and he/she has CB only.
Jeep B goes up with FRS only and gets into a very bad or delicate position.
Jeep C also has only CB and sees that Jeep B is in trouble and needs instructions to STOP immediately.
Jeep D has CB and FRS but has no visible view of Jeep A, B and C due to trail set up. (trees in the way, etc)
Jeep B not only needs immediate STOP but every instruction from this point on is imperative that it is concise and clear with no delays.
HOW is using FRS and CB's mixed going to ensure safety and no miscommunications?
In real world wheelin, i have seen numerous occassions where the 2 radio system may have led to disaster.
i think CB only should be mandatory on any grouyp trail rides.
Tom